Trouble In Shangri-La

4 Jun

Hagel's Pastel ImpotenceAnnoying pastel colors are in fashion, and the United States and China are determined to set a collision course in the world. That’s what I gather from Joshua Kurlantzick’s summary of the 12th International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) Asia Security Summit: The Shangri-La Dialogue, in Singapore on June 1, 2013.

All in all, though the Shangri-La Dialogue serves a useful purpose of getting Asia-Pacific leaders to talk to each other and establish the kind of personal links that could be necessary in averting crises, the region’s arms buildup and tensions continue to rise. Though some observers are hopeful that the current head of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Brunei (the chairmanship rotates each year), will be effective in moving ASEAN and China toward real negotiations over the South China Sea, this is doubtful.  It is true that Brunei is a contestant in the South China Sea, and that it has some experienced diplomats, and is also small enough to be viewed as an impartial mediator. But as the subtext of the Shangri-La Dialogue showed, no one in East Asia seems to be in any mood for real concessions on anything.

In the context of the pivot to Asia and the mess in the Middle East, is this collision with China a product of nostalgia?

Enhanced by Zemanta

One Response to “Trouble In Shangri-La”


  1. Vietnam PM’s keynote address at 12th Shangri-La Dialogue | sambhalkezabaan - 5 June 2013

    […] Trouble In Shangri-La ( […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: